Category: Facts

Calculation of Number of Moles and Molecules

Post author By Hemant More
Post date July 6, 2022
No Comments on Calculation of Number of Moles and Molecules

Science > Chemistry > Molecule and Molecular Mass > Calculation of Number of Moles and Molecules In this article, we shall solve problems to calculate number of moles and number of molecules and atoms present in given quantity of a substance. Example 01: 3.49 g of ammonia at STP occupies 4.48 dm3. Calculate molar mass […]

Legal Maxims

Res ipsa loquitur

“Res ipsa loquitur” is a Latin phrase that means, “the thing speaks for itself” and pertains to obvious cases of negligence. Under the common law of negligence, the res ipsa loquitur doctrine indicates that a breach of a party’s duty of care may be inferred from the events that occurred. In other words, the negligence is so […]

Tags AIR 1966 SC 1750, AIR 1999 Raj 96, Byrne v. Boadle, Hayes v. Peters, K. Sobha v. Dr. Mrs. Raj Kumari Unithan, Legal maxim, Medical negligence, Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Subhagwanti, Negligence, Nihal Kaur v. Director, O'Neal v. Burlington N. Inc., P.G.I., R.S.R.T.C. v. Smt. Sayar Bai, Read v. S. Pine Elec. Power Asso., Res Ipsa Loquitur

Medical Jurisprudence

Medical Negligence

Law > Medical Jurisprudence > Law and Medicine > Medical Negligence A tort is a residuary civil wrong. Duties in tort are fixed by the law and such duties are owed in rem or to the people at large generally. Such wrongs can be remedied by filing for unliquidated damages. Negligence is a tort. A […]

Tags King v. Phillips, (1953) 1 QB 429, 2003 (1) CLD 81, AIR 1995 P H 278, AIR 2002 Guwahati 102, AIR 2007 (NOC) 2498 (H.P.), AIR 2008 H.P. 97, C.P. Sreekumar (Dr.), Calcutta Medical Research Institute vs Bimalesh Chatterjee, Childbirth Trauma, Civil liability, Contributory Negligence, Criminal liability, Delayed Diagnosis, Dr. Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab, Dr. Kunal Saha v. Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee, Dr. Suresh Gupta vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi, Errors in Anesthesia, Gian chand v. Vinod kumar Sharma, Jagdish Ram v. State of H.P., Jasbir Kaur v. State of Punjab, Labour Malpractice, Law and Medicine, Medical Jurisprudence, Medical negligence, Misdiagnosis, Mr. M Ramesh Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, MS (Ortho) v. S. Ramanujam, Negligence, Negligent Long-Term Treatment, Negligent Medical Advice, Poonam Verma v. Ashwin Patel 1996 (4) SCC, Prescription and Medication Errors, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Roe v. Minister of Health (1954 2 Q. B. 66), Sishir Rajan Saha v. The state of Tripura, State of Haryana v. Smt Santra, Surgical Negligence, Unnecessary Surgery, V. Kishan Rao Vs Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital, Vinod Jain v. Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital

Medical Jurisprudence

Right to Health in the Constitution

Post author By Hemant More
Post date July 4, 2022
No Comments on Right to Health in the Constitution

Law > Medical Jurisprudence > Law and Medicine > Right to Health in the Constitution Health is a vital indicator of human development and human development is the basic ingredient of economic and social development. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the […]

Tags 1987 AIR 232, AIR 1995 SC 922, (1996) 4 SCC 37, 1986 SCALE (2) 230, 1995 (2) SCC 577, AIR 1980 SC 65, AIR 1984 SC 802, AIR 1987 SC 994, AIR 1988 SC 1863, AIR 1989 SC 2039, AIR 1992 SC 573, AIR 1993 SC 2178, AIR 1997 Ori 37, AIR 1997 SC1225, AIR 1998 Cal 121, Article 14, Article 15, Article 19, Article 21, Article 226, Article 32, Article 38, Article 39, Article 41, Article 42, Article 43, Article 45, Article 47, Article 48 A, Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, Burrabazar Fire Works Dealers Association v. Commissioner of Police, Calcutta, CESC Ltd. v. Subash Chandra Bose, Constitution, Constitution of India, Consumer Education and Research Center v. Union of India, Directive Principles, Euthanasia, Fundamental Duties, Fundamental rights, J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Lakshami Kant Pandey v. Union of India, M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, Mahendra Pratap Singh v. State of Orissa, Medical Jurisprudence, P Sivaswamy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Parmananda Katara Vs Union of India, Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal, Sheela Barse v. Union of India, tate of Punjab v. M.S. Chawla, U.P.S.E. Board v. Harishankar, Unnikrishnan, Vincent Panikurlangara v. Union of India, Virender Gaur v. State of Haryana, Writ Petition (civil) 13029 of 1985

Medical Jurisprudence

Medico-Legal Aspect of Sexual Assault

Post author By Hemant More
Post date July 3, 2022
No Comments on Medico-Legal Aspect of Sexual Assault

Law > Medical Jurisprudence > Law and Medicine > Medico-Legal Aspect of Sexual Assault A Medico-Legal Case (MLC) can be defined as a case of injury or ailment, etc., in which investigations by the law-enforcing agencies are essential to fix the responsibility regarding the causation of the injury or ailment. It may be a legal […]

Tags 2000 (3) SCR 1007, AIR 1989 SC 2039, Delhi Commission of Women v. Delhi Police, Indian Penal Code, IPC, Law and Medicine, Medical Jurisprudence, Medico Legal Case, Medico-Legal Aspect of Sexual Assault, MLC, Parmananda Katara Vs Union of India, Rape, Rape Evaluation Test, SAFE kit, Sexual Assault, Sodemy, State of Karnataka v. Manjanna, Unnatural sex, W.P. (CRL) 696/2008

Medical Jurisprudence

Human Experimentation with Drugs

Post author By Hemant More
Post date July 3, 2022
No Comments on Human Experimentation with Drugs

Law > Medical Jurisprudence > Law and Medicine > Medico-Legal Aspect of Human Experimentation with Drugs Human experimentation can be broadly defined as anything done to an individual to learn how it will affect him. The main objective of human experimentation with drugs is the acquisition of new scientific knowledge rather than therapy. Human experimentation […]

Tags Clinical trials, Ethics Committee, Helsinki Declaration, Human experimentation, Law and Medicine, Medical Jurisprudence, Medico Legal Case, Medico-Legal Aspect, Nuremberg Code

Medical Jurisprudence

Medico-Legal Aspect of Road Accidents

Post author By Hemant More
Post date July 2, 2022
No Comments on Medico-Legal Aspect of Road Accidents

Law > Medical Jurisprudence > Law and Medicine > Medico-Legal Aspect of Road Accidents A Medico-Legal Case (MLC) can be defined as a case of injury or ailment, etc., in which investigations by the law-enforcing agencies are essential to fix the responsibility regarding the causation of the injury or ailment. It may be a legal case requiring […]

Tags AIR 1989 SC 2039, AIR 2016 SC 1617, Golden hour, Good Samaritan Law, Medical Jurisprudence, Medico Legal Case, Medico Legal Case Report, MLC, Parmananda Katara Vs Union of India, Road accidents, Save Life Foundation v. Union of India

Medical Jurisprudence

Pattern Injuries to Pedestrians in Road Accident

Post author By Hemant More
Post date July 2, 2022
No Comments on Pattern Injuries to Pedestrians in Road Accident

Law > Medical Jurisprudence > Law and Medicine > Pattern Injuries to Pedestrians in Road Accident A traffic or road accident is defined as an accident involving at least one vehicle on a road open to public traffic in which at least one person is injured or killed. The main cause of accidents and crashes […]

Tags Bumper injuries, Injuries to pedestrian, Medico Legal Case, MLC, Primary Impact Injuries, Road accident, run Over injuries, Secondary Impact Injuries, Secondary Injuries

Civil Procedure Code

Rejection of Plaint

Indian Legal System > Civil Laws > The Code of Civil Procedure > Rejection of Plaint by the Court (Order VII Rules 11, 12 and 13) The term Plaint has not been defined in the Code. However, it can be defined as a statement of claim by presentation of which the suit is instituted. It […]

Tags (1998) 2 SCC 170, (2004) 9 SCC 512, (2007) 5 SCC 614, (2012) 8 SCC 706, (Gajra)(D), 2007 (2) SCC 551, 2020 SCC OnLine SC 562, 7 (2003) 1 SCC 557, Admission of plaint, AIR 1935 Cal 157, AIR 1961 Cal 491, AIR 1966 Ker 150, AIR 1971 AP 313, AIR 1971 SC 1374, AIR 1979 SC 989, AIR 1982 SC 1559, AIR 1986 SC 1253, AIR 1988 SC 1636, AIR 2003 SC 759, AIR 2004 SC 1801, AIR 2005 Guj 9, AIR 2006 SC 1828, AIR 2008 SC 685, AIR 2009 Pat 19, Annapurna Dassi v. Sarat Chandra, Azhar Hussain v. Rajiv Gandhi, Bibhas Mohan Mukherjee v. Hari Charan Banerjee, Church of Christ Charitable Trust & Educational Charitable Society v. Ponniamman Educational Trust, Civil Appeal No. 1689 of 2022, Civil Procedure Code, Commercial Aviation & Travel Company v. Vimal Pannalal, CPC, Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali, Hardesh Ores (P.) Ltd. v. Hede & Co., I.T.C. Ltd. v. Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kalepur Pala Subrahmanyam v Tiguti Venkata, Kuok Oils and Grains PTE Ltd. v. Tower International Pvt. Ltd., Laxman Prasad v. Progigy Electronics Ltd., Liverpool & London S.P. & I Assn. Ltd. v. M. V. Sea Success I, M/S Frost International Limited v. M/S Milan Developers and Builders (P) Limited, Madanuri Sri Ramachandra Murthy v. Syed Jalal, Mannan Lal v. Chhotaka Bibi, Mayar H.K. Ltd. v. Owner and Parties Vessel M.V. Fortune Express, Meenakshisundaram v. Venkatachalam, Meera Sinha v. Girija Sinha, Order VII Rule 11, Parukutty Amma v. Ramaunni, Plaint, Prem Lala Nahata v. Chandi Prasad Sikaria, Raghwendra Sharan Singh v. Ram Prasanna Singh, Rejection of plaint, Return of plaint, Roop Lal Sathi v. Nachhatter Singh Gill, Sakeen Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, SLP (C) No. 20068 of 2013, SLP (Civil) No. 35352 of 216, Sopan Sukhdeo Sable v. Assistant Charity Commissioner

Civil Procedure Code

Return of Plaint by the Court (Order VII Rules 10, 10A and 10B)

Post author By Hemant More
Post date June 30, 2022
1 Comment on Return of Plaint by the Court (Order VII Rules 10, 10A and 10B)

Indian Legal System > Civil Laws > The Code of Civil Procedure > Return of Plaint by the Court (Order VII Rules 10, 10A and 10B) The term Plaint has not been defined in the Code. However, it can be defined as a statement of claim by presentation of which the suit is instituted. It […]

Tags (1912) 35 Mad 567, (1997) 9 SCC 688, Admission of plaint, AIR 1927 Pat 254, AIR 1942 All 130, AIR 1946 All 488, AIR 1965 Cal 59, AIR 1979 Del 114, AIR 1979 Mad 196, AIR 1987 Bom 364, AIR 1988 Cal. 273, AIR 1997 Bom 280, Civil Procedure Code, CPC, George Shipping Co. Ltd. v. MV Irene Pa Foreign Flagged Vessel, Gopi Krishna v. Avil Bose, Hanamanthappa v. Chandrashekhrappa, Institution of Suit, Jurisdiction, Kallu v. Phudan, Latadevi v. Ramnath, Latu v. Rani Mahalaxmi Bai, Moneys Transports v. Tanjore, Pecuniary jurisdiction, Plaint, Rejection of plaint, Return of plaint, Secretary of State v. Natabar, Smt. Sheela Adhikari v. Rabindra Nath Adhikari, Subject matter jurisdiction, Suit, Territorial jurisdiction, Vicco Laboratories Bombay v. Hindustan Rimmer, Visweswara v. Nair