Uncover the Facts

Category: Facts

Concept of Marriage in Hinduism

Post author By Hemant More
Post date August 21, 2019
1 Comment on Concept of Marriage in Hinduism

Indian Legal System > Family laws > Civil Laws >The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 > Concept of Marriage in Hinduism India is the only country in the world which permits persons belonging to different religions to follow their own personal laws based on their religion. Thus in respect to personal matters like marriage, divorce, succession, […]

Tags 16 Sanskars, Anjona Dasi v. Ghose, Ardhangini, Bhagwati saran Singh v. Parmeshwari Nandar Singh, Dhanjit Vadra v. Beena Vadra, Hindu Marriage Act divorce, Hindu Marriage Act Section 9, Muthusami v. Masilamani, Purushottamdas v. Purushottamdas, Sacrament, Shivonandh v. Bhagawanthumma, Tikait v. Basant, Vivah, Vivaha

Transfer of Property Act

Types of Mortgages

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Types of Mortgages The classification of mortgage has been made on the basis of the nature of the interest which is transferred for securing the loan. Accordingly, there is a difference in the rights and liabilities in each kind of mortgage. These six types of […]

Tags (1890) 12 All 203, (1961) 14 Bom. L.R. 1020, AIR (1916) PC 119, AIR (1939) Pat 540, AIR (1965) SC 430, AIR 1954 SC 345, AIR 1975 Mad. 282, AIR 1997 Mad 105, AIR 2001 Bom. 369, Anomalous Mortgage, Butto Kkristo v. Govindram, Chathu v Kunjan (1889) 12 Madras 109, Chunchun Jha v. Ibadat Ali, English mortgage, Hikmatulla v. Imam Ali, ILR (1902) 25 Madras 220 (235) (FB), Indian Legal System, Jethibai v. Putlibai, K.J. Nathan, Kamal Shivajirao Katkar v. Gajrabai Sopanrao Algude, Kishan Lai v Ganga Ram (1891) 13 Allahabad 28, Law, Madho Rao v Gulam Mohiuddin AIR 1919 PC 121, Mortgage, Mortgage by conditional sale, Mortgage by Deposit of Title deeds, Narayana v Venkataramana, Natesa Pathar v Pakkirisamy Pathar, Prakasam v. Rajambal, Property Laws, Ram Narayan Singh v. Adhindra Nath, Rama v Samiyappa ILR (1881) 4 Mad 179 183 184, S. Maruthi, Section 58 (e): English mortgage, Simple mortgage, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act, Types of mortgage, Usufructuary Mortgage

Transfer of Property Act

Mortgage

Section 58: “Mortgage”, “mortgagor”, “mortgagee”, “mortgage-money” and “mortgage-deed” defined.— (a) A mortgage is the transfer of an interest in specific immoveable property for the purpose of securing the payment of money advanced or to be advanced by way of loan, an existing or future debt, or the performance of an engagement which may give rise to […]

Transfer of Property Act

Liabilities of Lessee

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Liabilities of Lessee Section 108 of the Act deals with the liabilities and rights of the lessor and lessee of immovable property. In this article, we shall discuss the liabilities of lessee. Section 108 clauses (k) to (q) deals with the liabilities of lessee Section […]

Tags 2003 AIHC 291 (297, 2012 (191) DLT 594 (Del), 298) (Cal), AIR 1955 Nag 134 (DB), AIR 1955 NUC 52 (MP), AIR 1998 Cal 292 (298), Hirabai v. Jivanlal, Indian Legal System, Law, Liabilities of Lessee, Paritosh Ghosh v. Ashim Kumar Gupta, Property Laws, Rameshwar Dayal v. Mani Lal. AIR 1977 All 534 (535, Rameshwar Roy v. Baidendra Kinkar Patra, Santsaran v. Bankeylal Ramlal, Section 108, Sky Land International Pvt. Ltd. v. Kavita P. Lalwani, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act

Transfer of Property Act

Rights of Lessee

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Rights of Lessee Section 108 of the Act deals with the liabilities and rights of the lessor and lessee of immovable property. In this article, we shall discuss the rights of lessee. Section 108: Rights and liabilities of lessor and lessee: In the absence of […]

Tags & 18 v. M. Shafi Ul Huq, 17, Dada Siba Estate v. Raja Dharmdev Chand, George J. Ovungal v. Peter, Home School NO. 16, Kakalpudi Rangaraju v. Happavaluri Sitaramaya, Maa Durga Enterprises v. State of Bihar, Narayan Das v. Jatindranath, Pritam Prakash Davar & Sons HUF v. Krisan Kumar Bhasin, Section 108, Shakuntala Devi Darak v. Transport Corporatiuon of India Ltd., T P Act, Tabor v. Godfrey, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act, V. G. K. Design & Development Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. H. N. Narayana Reddy, Veeran Devi v. Lt. Governor

Transfer of Property Act

Liabilities and Rights of Lessor

Post author By Hemant More
Post date August 19, 2019
No Comments on Liabilities and Rights of Lessor

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Liabilities and Rights of Lessor Section 108 of the Act deals with the liabilities and rights of the lessor and lessee of immovable property. In this article, we shall discuss the liabilities and rights of lessor. Section 108: Rights and liabilities of lessor and lessee. […]

Tags Harish Chander v. Mohinee Mohun, Hirabai v. Jivanlal, Keates v. Cadogan, Megh Lal v. Raj Kumar, Munne Dutt v. William Cumpbell, Paritosh Ghosh v. Ashim Kumar Gupta, Pemmarazu v. The secretary of State of India, Radha Krishna v. W. C. O. Flaherty, Righs of lessor, Santsaran v. Bankeylal Ramlal, Section 108, Sky Land International Pvt. Ltd. v. Kavita P. Lalwani, State Bank of Hyderabad v. Nehru Palace Hotels, Syed Mukhtar v. rani Sunder Koer, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act, Yashpal Lala Shiv Narain v. Allatala Tala Malik Waqf Ajakhan Mus

Transfer of Property Act

Introduction to Lease

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Introduction to Lease One of the modes of transfer of immovable property for a particular period of time is Lease. A lease is a transfer of an interest in the property for a stipulated period of time without transferring the ownership of that property. In […]

Indian Contract Act

Communication of Acceptance (S. 3 and S. 4)

Post author By Hemant More
Post date August 16, 2019
1 Comment on Communication of Acceptance (S. 3 and S. 4)

Indian Legal System > Civil Laws > Indian Contract Act, 1872 > Communication of Acceptance In contract proposal and acceptance of proposal are important ingredient. In last few articles, we have discussed, proposal, types of proposal, revocation of proposal. In this article, we shall discuss the communication of acceptance. Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract […]

Indian Contract Act

Revocation of Offer (Ss. 3, 5, and 6)

Post author By Hemant More
Post date August 16, 2019
No Comments on Revocation of Offer (Ss. 3, 5, and 6)

Indian Legal System > Civil Laws > Indian Contract Act, 1872 > Revocation of Offer A proposal is main ingredient of a valid contract. The term “proposal” of the Indian Contract Act is synonymous to the term “Offer” in English law. Section 2(a)of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines proposal as “when one person signifies […]

Indian Contract Act

Communication of an Offer (S. 3 and 4)

Post author By Hemant More
Post date August 16, 2019
No Comments on Communication of an Offer (S. 3 and 4)

Indian Legal System > Civil Laws > Indian Contract Act, 1872 > Communication of Offer A proposal is main ingredient of a valid contract. The term “proposal” of the Indian Contract Act is synonymous to the term “Offer” in English law. Section 2(a)of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines proposal as “when one person signifies […]

Tags (1862) EWHC CP J35, 106 ER 250 (KB), 25 L.J. Ex. 329, Adams v. Lindsell, Communication of proposal, Felthouse V. Bindley, Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt, P. Syamala v. R. Gopinathan, Ram Krishan Singhal v. Executive Engineer, SBI v. Aditya Finance & Leasing Co. Pvt. Ltd., T. Jayram Naidu v. Yashodha, Taylor v. Laird, TimeLine of Communication of Proposal