Indian Legal System > Civil Laws > Indian Contract Act, 1872 > Section 124: Contract of Indemnity The distinctive feature of Contract Law, as compared to other branches of law, is that in the former the parties make law for themselves within the broad framework of the Contract Law. The importance of the contract in […]
Categories
Section 124: Contract of Indemnity
- Post author By Hemant More
- Post date April 12, 2020
- 3 Comments on Section 124: Contract of Indemnity
- Tags (1827) 4 Bing 66, (1834) 2 Ad. & E. 57, (1875) LR.10 CP196, (1903) AC 114 (HL), (2 Ad. & E. 57), 1905 AC 392, 5 Bing. N. C. 636, Adamson v. Jarvis, AIR 1942 Bom 302, AIR 1946 Mad 472, ajanan Moreshwar Parelkar V. Moreshwar Madan Mantri, Betts v. Gibbins, Dugdale v Lovering, Enforcement of Contract of Indemnity, Indemnity, Indemnity holder, Indian Contract Act, K.P Ram Kuppam Chettiar v. Sp. Ram swami Chettiar, Section 124, Sheffield Corp. v. Barclay, Starkey v. Bank of England, Toplis v. Grane, Toplis v. Grane (5 Bing. N. C. 636)
