Uncover the Facts

Tag: TOPA

The Exclusion of Oral by Documentary Evidence (Section 91 of IEA)

Post author By Hemant More
Post date June 2, 2022
No Comments on The Exclusion of Oral by Documentary Evidence (Section 91 of IEA)

Law > The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 > Section 91 of IEA In this article we shall study Section 91 of IEA, the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 related to the concept of the exclusion of oral by documentary evidence. Meaning of Evidence: The term evidence has come from the Latin word “evident” which means “to show clearly” […]

Transfer of Property Act

Transfer of Property to Unborn Child

Post author By Hemant More
Post date November 14, 2020
No Comments on Transfer of Property to Unborn Child

Ascertaining property rights of an unborn is essential as it has a direct implication on the rights of other existent individuals. Although the Indian laws recognize the existence of an unborn as a legal person, rights are not granted until the birth of the child. Further, while a child in a mother’s womb is considered […]

Transfer of Property Act

Types of Mortgages

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Types of Mortgages The classification of mortgage has been made on the basis of the nature of the interest which is transferred for securing the loan. Accordingly, there is a difference in the rights and liabilities in each kind of mortgage. These six types of […]

Tags (1890) 12 All 203, (1961) 14 Bom. L.R. 1020, AIR (1916) PC 119, AIR (1939) Pat 540, AIR (1965) SC 430, AIR 1954 SC 345, AIR 1975 Mad. 282, AIR 1997 Mad 105, AIR 2001 Bom. 369, Anomalous Mortgage, Butto Kkristo v. Govindram, Chathu v Kunjan (1889) 12 Madras 109, Chunchun Jha v. Ibadat Ali, English mortgage, Hikmatulla v. Imam Ali, ILR (1902) 25 Madras 220 (235) (FB), Indian Legal System, Jethibai v. Putlibai, K.J. Nathan, Kamal Shivajirao Katkar v. Gajrabai Sopanrao Algude, Kishan Lai v Ganga Ram (1891) 13 Allahabad 28, Law, Madho Rao v Gulam Mohiuddin AIR 1919 PC 121, Mortgage, Mortgage by conditional sale, Mortgage by Deposit of Title deeds, Narayana v Venkataramana, Natesa Pathar v Pakkirisamy Pathar, Prakasam v. Rajambal, Property Laws, Ram Narayan Singh v. Adhindra Nath, Rama v Samiyappa ILR (1881) 4 Mad 179 183 184, S. Maruthi, Section 58 (e): English mortgage, Simple mortgage, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act, Types of mortgage, Usufructuary Mortgage

Transfer of Property Act

Liabilities of Lessee

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Liabilities of Lessee Section 108 of the Act deals with the liabilities and rights of the lessor and lessee of immovable property. In this article, we shall discuss the liabilities of lessee. Section 108 clauses (k) to (q) deals with the liabilities of lessee Section […]

Tags 2003 AIHC 291 (297, 2012 (191) DLT 594 (Del), 298) (Cal), AIR 1955 Nag 134 (DB), AIR 1955 NUC 52 (MP), AIR 1998 Cal 292 (298), Hirabai v. Jivanlal, Indian Legal System, Law, Liabilities of Lessee, Paritosh Ghosh v. Ashim Kumar Gupta, Property Laws, Rameshwar Dayal v. Mani Lal. AIR 1977 All 534 (535, Rameshwar Roy v. Baidendra Kinkar Patra, Santsaran v. Bankeylal Ramlal, Section 108, Sky Land International Pvt. Ltd. v. Kavita P. Lalwani, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act

Transfer of Property Act

Rights of Lessee

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Rights of Lessee Section 108 of the Act deals with the liabilities and rights of the lessor and lessee of immovable property. In this article, we shall discuss the rights of lessee. Section 108: Rights and liabilities of lessor and lessee: In the absence of […]

Tags & 18 v. M. Shafi Ul Huq, 17, Dada Siba Estate v. Raja Dharmdev Chand, George J. Ovungal v. Peter, Home School NO. 16, Kakalpudi Rangaraju v. Happavaluri Sitaramaya, Maa Durga Enterprises v. State of Bihar, Narayan Das v. Jatindranath, Pritam Prakash Davar & Sons HUF v. Krisan Kumar Bhasin, Section 108, Shakuntala Devi Darak v. Transport Corporatiuon of India Ltd., T P Act, Tabor v. Godfrey, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act, V. G. K. Design & Development Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. H. N. Narayana Reddy, Veeran Devi v. Lt. Governor

Transfer of Property Act

Liabilities and Rights of Lessor

Post author By Hemant More
Post date August 19, 2019
No Comments on Liabilities and Rights of Lessor

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Liabilities and Rights of Lessor Section 108 of the Act deals with the liabilities and rights of the lessor and lessee of immovable property. In this article, we shall discuss the liabilities and rights of lessor. Section 108: Rights and liabilities of lessor and lessee. […]

Tags Harish Chander v. Mohinee Mohun, Hirabai v. Jivanlal, Keates v. Cadogan, Megh Lal v. Raj Kumar, Munne Dutt v. William Cumpbell, Paritosh Ghosh v. Ashim Kumar Gupta, Pemmarazu v. The secretary of State of India, Radha Krishna v. W. C. O. Flaherty, Righs of lessor, Santsaran v. Bankeylal Ramlal, Section 108, Sky Land International Pvt. Ltd. v. Kavita P. Lalwani, State Bank of Hyderabad v. Nehru Palace Hotels, Syed Mukhtar v. rani Sunder Koer, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act, Yashpal Lala Shiv Narain v. Allatala Tala Malik Waqf Ajakhan Mus

Transfer of Property Act

Liabilities of Seller (S.55 (1) and S. 55(2))

Post author By Hemant More
Post date July 31, 2019
No Comments on Liabilities of Seller (S.55 (1) and S. 55(2))

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Liabilities of Seller The primary aim of laying down the rights and duties of the seller and the buyer in the case of sale is to ensure fair dealings, and as far as possible, to minimize fraud and waste of the property. In this article, […]

Tags Conveyance, Covenant, Flight v. Booth, Ganpat Ranglal v. Mangilal Hiralal, Jamshed v. Burjorji, Laxmidas & Company v. D.J. Tata, Mathuri Bawa v. Prafulla Routray, N.Narasingarayadu v. N. Ankineedu, Nathu Khan v. Buxto Nath, Raghunathan v. Chellammal, Ratanlal v Nanabhai, Rights of Seller, RL Pinto v FF Menezes AIR 2001 Kant 141, T P Act, Tavvala Veerabhadra Rao v. Bonam Venugopala Rao, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act

Transfer of Property Act

Sale of Immovable Property (S. 54)

Post author By Hemant More
Post date July 29, 2019
1 Comment on Sale of Immovable Property (S. 54)

Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Sale of Immovable Property Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 defines the sale of immovable property. Section 54 in The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 “Sale” defined.—‘‘Sale” is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised or part-paid and […]

Tags A Bhagyamma v. Bangalore Development Authority, Abdul Alim v. Abdul Sattar, Arjuna Reddy v. Arjuna C Thanga, Ashok Chandra v. Chota Nagpur Banking Corpn., Bangalore, Berni Madho v. Joh, Bishnudeo Narain Rai v. Anmol Devi, Biswanath Sahu v. Tribeni Mohan, Chander Singh v. Jamuna Prasad, Chandra Shankar v. Abhia, Commissioner of Income Tax v. Motor and General Stores, Compentency, Ghulam Mohamad v. Tek Chand, Hakim Singh v. Ram Sanehi, Hara Bewa v. Banchandilal, Immovable property, Inder Kaur v. Tara Singh, K. Lakshaman Rao v. G. Ratna Manikyamba, Kaliperunal v. Rajagopal, Kameshwar Choudhary v. State of Bihar, Krishan Tanjabi v. Aba, Lakhwinder Singh v. Paramjit Kaur, Lakshmi Narain Bamwal v. Jagdish Singh, Madan Pillai v. Badrakali, Mahima v. Dinabondhi, Malik Mohamad Shujaagt v. Salim Jahan, Mathura Mohan v. Ram Kumar, Misahul Enterprises v. Vijaya Srivastava, Munnalal v. Armaram, Nalamathu Venkaiya v. B.S. Neelkanta, Ponayya Goundan v. Muttu, Prem Singh v. Distt Board of Rawalpindi, Ram Jivan Rai v. Devli Nandan Rai, Ram Jiwan Rai v. Deoki Nandan Rai, Ram Saran Lall v. Domini Kuer, Ramlal v. Phagua, Rati Ram v. Mam Chand, Sabadeo Singh v. Kubernath, Sahadeo Singh v. Kubernath, Sale, Sale how made, Sarup Chand v. Surjit Kaur, Section 54, Shakeela Bano v. Mohd Bismil Siraj, Shib Lal v. Bhagwan, Shiva Narain Sab v. Baidya Nath Tewari, Subject matter of sale, Sura Reddy v. Ram Sarasa, Tapan Krishna Das v. Hazi Ali Khan, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act, Unnao Commercial Bank v. Kailash Nath, Venkataramana v. Rangiab