<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Void Archives - The Fact Factor</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thefactfactor.com/tag/void/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thefactfactor.com/tag/void/</link>
	<description>Uncover the Facts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 13:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Radius Ratio and its Significance</title>
		<link>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/radius-ratio/8074/</link>
					<comments>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/radius-ratio/8074/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hemant More]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2020 04:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Physical Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atomic mass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body-centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bravais Lattices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in one dimension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in three dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in two dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coordination number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crystal lattice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Density of solid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edge length of unit cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face-centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hexagonal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hexagonal close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locating octahedral void]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locating Tetrahedral void]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono Clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighbouring atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Octahedral voids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthorhombic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packing efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packing factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radius ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radius ratio of octahedral voids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radius ratio of tetrahedral voids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple primitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tetragonal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tetrahedral voids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triclinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of crystal lattice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Void]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voids in ionic solids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume of unit cell]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thefactfactor.com/?p=8074</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Science > Chemistry > Solid State > Radius Ratio and its Significance The ratio of the radius of cations (r+) to the radius of the anion (r&#8211;) is known as the radius ratio of the ionic solid. The significance of radius ratio: It is useful in predicting the structure of ionic solids. The structure of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/radius-ratio/8074/">Radius Ratio and its Significance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thefactfactor.com">The Fact Factor</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Science > <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/" target="_blank">Chemistry</a> > <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/solid-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Solid State</a> > Radius Ratio and its Significance</strong></h5>



<p>The ratio of
the radius of cations (r<sup>+</sup>) to the radius of the anion (r<sup>&#8211;</sup>)
is known as the radius ratio of the ionic solid.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="300" height="59" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-01.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8089"/></figure></div>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>The significance of radius ratio:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>It is useful in predicting the structure of ionic solids.</li><li>The structure of an ionic compound depends upon stoichiometry and the size of ions.</li><li>In crystals, cations tend to get surrounded by the largest possible number of anions around it.</li><li>Greater the radius ratio, greater is the coordination number of cations and anions.</li><li>If cations are extremely small and anions are extremely large, then the radius ratio is very small. In such case packing of anions is very close to each other and due to repulsion between anions, the system becomes unstable. Hence the structure changes to some suitable stable arrangement.</li><li>The radius ratio at which anions just touch each other, as well as central cation, is called the critical radius ratio.</li></ul>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Effect of Radius Ratio on Coordination Number:</strong></p>



<p>A cation
would fit exactly into the octahedral void and would have a coordination number
of six if the radius ratio were exactly 0.414. Similarly, a cation would fit
exactly into the tetrahedral void and would have a coordination number of four,
if the radius ratio were exactly 0.225.</p>



<p>Let us
consider a case in which a cation is fitting exactly into the octahedral void
of close pack anions and have the coordination number of six, in this case, the
radius ratio is exactly 0.414.</p>



<p>When the radius ratio is greater than this, then the anions move apart to accommodate larger cation. This situation is relatively unstable. If the radius ratio is further increased the anions will move farther and farther apart till to reach a stage at which more anions can be accommodated. Now, the bigger cation moves to bigger void i.e. octahedral void whose coordination number is 8. This happens when the radius ratio exceeds 0.732.</p>



<p>In case of
radius ratio becomes less than 0.414, the six anions will not be able to touch
the smaller cation. To touch the cation, the anions starts overlapping with
each other, which is an unstable situation. Hence smaller cation moves to
smaller void i.e. tetrahedral void and coordination number decreases from 6 to
4.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="417" height="407" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-02.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8090" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-02.png 417w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-02-300x293.png 300w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-02-53x53.png 53w" sizes="(max-width: 417px) 100vw, 417px" /></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="418" height="206" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-03.png" alt="https://hemantmore.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Radius-ratio-04-300x148.png" class="wp-image-8091" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-03.png 418w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-03-300x148.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 418px) 100vw, 418px" /></figure></div>



<p><strong>Note:</strong> Although a large number of ionic substances obey this rule,
there are many exceptions to it.</p>



<p class="has-luminous-vivid-orange-color has-very-light-gray-background-color has-text-color has-background has-medium-font-size"><strong>Radius Ratio of Interstitial Voids</strong>:</p>



<p>The vacant space left in the closest pack arrangement of constituent particles is called an interstitial void or interstitial site.</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Tetrahedral Voids:</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Locating Tetrahedral Voids:</strong></h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="388" height="203" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-04.png" alt="https://hemantmore.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Radius-ratio-05-300x157.png" class="wp-image-8092" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-04.png 388w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-04-300x157.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 388px) 100vw, 388px" /></figure></div>



<p>Let us consider a unit cell of ccp or fcc lattice [Fig. (a)]. The unit cell is divided into eight small cubes. Each small cube has atoms at alternate corners as shown. Each small cube has 4 atoms. When joined to each other, they make a regular tetrahedron as shown in the figure.&nbsp;Thus, there is one tetrahedral void in each small cube and eight tetrahedral voids in total in the unit cell. Each of the eight small cubes has one void in one unit cell of ccp structure. The ccp structure has 4 atoms per unit cell. Thus, the number of tetrahedral voids is twice the number of atoms.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Radius Ratio of Tetrahedral Void:</strong></h4>



<p>A
tetrahedral site in a cube having a tetrahedral void of radius &#8216;r&#8217; is as shown
at the centre of the cube. Let &#8216;R&#8217; be the radius of the constituent particle of
the unit cell. Let &#8216;a&#8217; be each side of the cube.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="263" height="155" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-05.png" alt="https://hemantmore.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Radius-ratio-06.png" class="wp-image-8093"/></figure></div>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Consider face diagonal AB (Right-angled triangle ABC). We have,</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">AB<sup>2</sup> = a<sup>2</sup> + a<sup>2</sup></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; AB<sup>2</sup> = 2 a<sup>2</sup></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; AB<sup>2</sup> = √2 a</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Now the two-sphere touch each other&nbsp;along face diagonal
AB</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; 2R = √2 a</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; R&nbsp;= √2 a/2</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; R&nbsp;= &nbsp;a/√2 &nbsp;&#8230;&#8230;. (1)</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Consider body diagonal AD (Right-angled triangle ABD).&nbsp;We have,</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">AD<sup>2</sup> = AB<sup>2</sup> + BD<sup>2</sup></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; AD<sup>2</sup> = (√2 a)<sup>2</sup> + a<sup>2</sup></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; AD<sup>2</sup> = 2&nbsp;a<sup>2</sup> + a<sup>2&nbsp;</sup>=
3 a<sup>2</sup></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; AD = √3 a</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Now the two spheres at the diagonals touch the tetrahedral void sphere&nbsp;along body diagonal AD</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; 2 R + 2r&nbsp; = √3 a</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; R + r&nbsp; = (√3/2)a&nbsp; &#8230;&#8230;..&nbsp; (2)</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Dividing equation (2) by (1)</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="182" height="329" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-06.png" alt="https://hemantmore.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Radius-ratio-07-166x300.png" class="wp-image-8094" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-06.png 182w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-06-166x300.png 166w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 182px) 100vw, 182px" /></figure></div>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Thus the radius ratio for the tetrahedral void is 0.225</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Octahedral&nbsp;Voids:</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Locating Octahedral Voids:</strong></h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="418" height="209" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-07.png" alt="https://hemantmore.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Radius-ratio-08-300x150.png" class="wp-image-8095" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-07.png 418w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-07-300x150.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 418px) 100vw, 418px" /></figure></div>



<p>Let us
consider a unit cell of ccp or fcc lattice [Fig. (a)]. The body centre of the
cube, C is not occupied but it is surrounded by six atoms on face centres. If
these face centres are joined, an octahedron is generated. Thus, this unit cell
has one octahedral void at the body centre of the cube.</p>



<p>Besides the
body centre, there is one octahedral void at the centre of each of the 12
edges. [Fig. (b)]. It is surrounded by six atoms, four belonging to the same
unit cell (2 on the corners and 2 on face centre) and two belonging to two
adjacent unit cells.</p>



<p>Since each
edge of the cube is shared between four adjacent unit cells, so is the
octahedral void located on it. Only 1/4 th of each void belongs to a particular
unit cell.</p>



<p>For cubic close-packed structure:<br>
Number of octahedral void at the body-centre of the cube = 1<br>
12 octahedral voids located at each edge and shared between four unit cells</p>



<p>Thus number of octahedral valve at 12 edges =12 x 1/4 = 3<br>
Thus, the total number of octahedral voids in unit cell = 1 + 3 = 4</p>



<p>In
the&nbsp;ccp structure, each unit cell has 4 atoms. Thus, the number of
octahedral voids is equal to this number of atoms.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Radius Ratio of Octahedral Void:</strong></h4>



<p>A octahedral site in a cube having octahedral void of radius r is as shown at the centre of the cube. Let R be the radius of the constituent particle of the unit cell. Let a be each side of the cube. In this case we can see that a = 2R</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="390" height="134" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-08.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8096" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-08.png 390w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-08-300x103.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 390px) 100vw, 390px" /></figure></div>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Consider Right angled triangle ABC.&nbsp;We have,</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">AB<sup>2</sup> = AC<sup>2</sup> + CB<sup>2</sup></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; (2R + 2r)<sup>2</sup> = a<sup>2</sup> + a<sup>2</sup></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; (2R + 2r)<sup>2</sup> = 2 a<sup>2</sup></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; 2R + 2r = √2 a</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">But from figure a = 2R</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; 2R + 2r = √2 x 2R</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; &nbsp;R +&nbsp; r = √2&nbsp; R</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; &nbsp;r = √2&nbsp; R &#8211; R</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; &nbsp;r = (√2&nbsp; &#8211; 1)R</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; &nbsp;r = (1.414&nbsp; &#8211; 1)R</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">∴&nbsp; &nbsp;r = 0.414R</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="157" height="48" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Radius-Ratio-09.png" alt="https://hemantmore.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Radius-ratio-09.png" class="wp-image-8097"/></figure></div>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Thus radius ratio for the octahedral void is 0.414</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Science > <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/" target="_blank">Chemistry</a> > <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/solid-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Solid State</a> > Radius Ratio and its Significance</strong></h5>
<p>The post <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/radius-ratio/8074/">Radius Ratio and its Significance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thefactfactor.com">The Fact Factor</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/radius-ratio/8074/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tetrahedral Voids and Octahedral Voids</title>
		<link>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/tetrahedral-voids-octhedral-voids/8066/</link>
					<comments>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/tetrahedral-voids-octhedral-voids/8066/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hemant More]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2020 04:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Physical Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atomic mass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body-centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bravais Lattices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in one dimension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in three dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in two dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coordination number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crystal lattice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Density of solid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edge length of unit cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face-centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hexagonal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hexagonal close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono Clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighbouring atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Octahedral voids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthorhombic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packing efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packing factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple primitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tetragonal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tetrahedral voids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triclinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of crystal lattice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Void]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voids in ionic solids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume of unit cell]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thefactfactor.com/?p=8066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Science > Chemistry > Solid State > Tetrahedral Voids and Octahedral Voids In this article, we shall study two types of voids formed during hexagonal closed packing namely, a) Tetrahedral voids and b) octahedral voids. Let us consider a closed pack hexagonal packing in the first layer as shown. There are empty spaces between the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/tetrahedral-voids-octhedral-voids/8066/">Tetrahedral Voids and Octahedral Voids</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thefactfactor.com">The Fact Factor</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Science > <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/" target="_blank">Chemistry</a> > <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/solid-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Solid State</a> > Tetrahedral Voids and Octahedral Voids</strong></h5>



<p>In this article, we shall study two types of voids formed during hexagonal closed packing namely, a) Tetrahedral voids and b) octahedral voids.</p>



<p>Let us
consider a closed pack hexagonal packing in the first layer as shown. There are
empty spaces between the particles (sphere) are called voids.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="225" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-05.png" alt="Tetrahedral Voids" class="wp-image-8060" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-05.png 300w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-05-285x214.png 285w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></figure></div>



<p>All the voids are equivalent in the first layer they have marked alternately as &#8216;a&#8217; and &#8216;b&#8217;. The spheres of the second layer can be either placed on voids which are marked &#8216;a&#8217; or &#8216;b&#8217; but it is impossible to place spheres on both types of voids simultaneously. When spheres of the new layer are placed on voids marked &#8216;a&#8217; then voids marked as &#8216;b; remain unoccupied.</p>



<p>Thus there
is no void above &#8216;a&#8217; in the second layer but there is void above &#8216;b&#8217; even in
the second layer. The void between the first layer and second layer at &#8216;a&#8217; is
tetrahedral void, while the void between the first layer and the second layer
at &#8216;b&#8217; is octahedral void.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="503" height="243" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-07.png" alt="Tetrahedral Voids" class="wp-image-8062" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-07.png 503w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-07-300x145.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 503px) 100vw, 503px" /></figure></div>



<p class="has-text-align-center">T = Tetrahedral void and O = Octahedral void</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Tetrahedral Voids:</strong></h4>



<p>Wherever a sphere of the second layer is above the void of the first layer (or vice versa) a tetrahedral void is formed. These voids are called tetrahedral voids because a tetrahedron is formed when the centres of these four spheres are joined.&nbsp;These voids have been marked as ‘T’ in the figure.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="690" height="201" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Tetrahedral-and-Octahedral-voids-02.png" alt="Tetrahedral Voids" class="wp-image-8072" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Tetrahedral-and-Octahedral-voids-02.png 690w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Tetrahedral-and-Octahedral-voids-02-300x87.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 690px) 100vw, 690px" /></figure></div>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Octahedral Voids:</strong></h4>



<p>At other places, the triangular voids in the second layer are above the triangular voids in the first layer, and the triangular shapes of these do not overlap then the octahedral void is formed. One of them has the apex of the triangle pointing upwards and the other downwards. These voids have been marked as ‘O’ in the figure.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Tetrahedral-and-Octahedral-voids-01.png" alt="https://hemantmore.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Packing-in-solids-10-300x107.png" class="wp-image-8071" width="501" height="179" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Tetrahedral-and-Octahedral-voids-01.png 465w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Tetrahedral-and-Octahedral-voids-01-300x107.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 501px) 100vw, 501px" /></figure></div>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Number of Voids:</strong></p>



<p>The number
of these two types of voids depends upon the number of close-packed spheres.</p>



<p>Let the number of close-packed spheres be N, then,&nbsp;the number of octahedral voids generated = N and the number of tetrahedral voids generated = 2N</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Characteristics of Tetrahedral Voids:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>The vacant space or void is surrounded by four atomic spheres. Hence co-ordination number of the tetrahedral void is 4.</li><li>The atom in the tetrahedral void is in contact with four atoms placed at four corners of a tetrahedron.</li><li>This void is formed when a triangular void made coplanar atoms (first layer) is in contact with the fourth atom above or below it (second layer).</li><li>The volume of the void is much smaller than that of the spherical particle.</li><li>If R is the radius of the constituent spherical particle, then the radius of the tetrahedral void is 0.225 R.</li><li>If the number of close-packed spheres is N, then the number of tetrahedral voids is 2N.</li></ul>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Characteristics of Octahedral Voids:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>The vacant space or void is surrounded by six atomic spheres. Hence, the&nbsp;coordination number of the tetrahedral void is 6.</li><li>The atom in the octahedral void is in contact with six atoms placed at six corners of an octahedron.</li><li>This void is formed when two sets of equilateral triangles pointing in the opposite direction with six spheres.</li><li>The volume of the void is small.</li><li>If R is the radius of the constituent spherical particle, then the radius of the octahedral void is 0.414 R.</li><li>If the number of close-packed spheres is N, then the number of octahedral voids is N.Characteristics of Voids</li></ul>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Packing Voids in Ionic Solids</strong></p>



<p>We have already seen that when particles are close-packed resulting in either cubic closed packing (ccp) or hexagonal close&nbsp;packing (hcp) structure, two types of voids are generated. The number of octahedral voids present in a lattice is equal to the number of close-packed particles, the number of tetrahedral voids generated is twice this number.</p>



<p>Ionic solids
are formed from cations and anions. The charge is&nbsp;balanced by an
appropriate number of both types of ions so that net charge on solid is zero
(neutral).</p>



<p>In ionic
solids, the bigger ions (usually, anions) form the close-packed structure and
the smaller ions (usually, cations) occupy the voids. If the smaller ion is
small enough then tetrahedral voids are occupied, if bigger, then octahedral
voids are occupied.</p>



<p>Not all
octahedral or tetrahedral voids are occupied. In a given compound, the fraction
of octahedral or tetrahedral voids that are occupied, depends upon the chemical
formula of the compound, as can be seen from the following examples.</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Example 1:</strong></p>



<p><strong>A compound is formed by two elements X and Y. Atoms of the element Y (as anions) make cubic closed packing (ccp)&nbsp;and those of the element X (as cations) occupy all the octahedral voids. Obtain the formula of the compound.</strong></p>



<p><strong>Solution:</strong></p>



<p>Given that the cubic closed packing (ccp)&nbsp;lattice is
formed by the element Y.</p>



<p>The number of octahedral voids generated would be equal to
the number of atoms of Y present in it.</p>



<p>Since all the octahedral voids are occupied by the atoms of X, their number would also be equal to that of the element Y. Thus, the atoms of elements X and Y are present in equal numbers or 1:1 ratio.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Therefore, the formula of the compound is XY.</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Example 2:</strong></p>



<p><strong>Atoms of element B form hexagonal close packing (hcp) lattice and those of element A occupy 2/3rd of tetrahedral voids. Obtain the formula of the compound formed by the elements A and B</strong>.</p>



<p><strong>Solution:</strong></p>



<p>The number of tetrahedral voids formed is equal to twice the
number of atoms of element B</p>



<p>Only 2/3rd of these are occupied by the atoms of element A. Hence the ratio of the number of atoms of A and B is 2 × (2/3):1 or 4:3</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Hence the formula of the compound is A<sub>4</sub>B<sub>3</sub>.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Science > <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/" target="_blank">Chemistry</a> > <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/solid-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Solid State</a> > Tetrahedral Voids and Octahedral Voids</strong></h5>
<p>The post <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/tetrahedral-voids-octhedral-voids/8066/">Tetrahedral Voids and Octahedral Voids</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thefactfactor.com">The Fact Factor</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/tetrahedral-voids-octhedral-voids/8066/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Packing in solids</title>
		<link>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/close-packing-in-solids/8050/</link>
					<comments>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/close-packing-in-solids/8050/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hemant More]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2020 03:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Physical Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atomic mass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body-centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bravais Lattices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in one dimension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in three dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close packing in two dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coordination number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crystal lattice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubic structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Density of solid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edge length of unit cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face-centered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hexagonal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hexagonal close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono Clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighbouring atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Octahedral voids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthorhombic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packing efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packing factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple primitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square close packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tetragonal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tetrahedral voids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triclinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of crystal lattice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Void]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume of unit cell]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thefactfactor.com/?p=8050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Science > Chemistry > Solid State > Packing in solids In this article, we shall study the different types of close packing of the constituent particles in solids. The Principle of Packing in Solids: In a crystal particle (atoms, molecules or ions) occupy the lattice points in the crystal lattice. These particles may be of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/close-packing-in-solids/8050/">Packing in solids</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thefactfactor.com">The Fact Factor</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Science > <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/" target="_blank">Chemistry</a> > <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/solid-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Solid State</a> > Packing in solids</strong></h5>



<p>In this article, we shall study the different types of close packing of the constituent particles in solids.</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>The Principle of Packing in Solids:</strong></p>



<p>In a crystal
particle (atoms, molecules or ions) occupy the lattice points in the crystal
lattice. These particles may be of various shapes and hence mode of packing of
these particles will change according to their shape.</p>



<p>Constituent particles are considered rigid incompressible spheres of equal size. The constituent particles try to get closely packed together so that the maximum closely packed structure is attained. The maximum closely packed structure is such that the minimum empty space (void) is left. The closer the constituent particles lie, the greater is the stability of the packed system. By this arrangement, a&nbsp;maximum possible density of the crystal and stability of the&nbsp;crystal is achieved.</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Close Packing in One Dimension:</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="280" height="38" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-01.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8056"/></figure></div>



<p>There is
only one way of arranging spheres in a one-dimensional close-packed structure,
that is to arrange them in a row and touching each other.</p>



<p>In this
arrangement, each sphere is in contact with two of its neighbours. The number
of nearest neighbours of a particle is called its coordination number. Thus, in
a&nbsp;one-dimensional close-packed arrangement, the coordination number is 2.</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Close Packing in Two Dimensions:</strong></p>



<p>A two-dimensional close-packed structure can be generated by placing the rows of close-packed spheres side by side horizontally. This can be done in two different ways.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">a) <strong>Square Close Packing:</strong></h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="156" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-02.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8057"/></figure></div>



<p>The second
row may be placed in contact with the first one such that the spheres of the
second row are exactly above those of the first row. The spheres of the two
rows are aligned horizontally as well as vertically. If we call the first row
as ‘A’ type row, the second row being exactly the same as the first one, is
also of ‘A’ type. Similarly, we may place more rows to obtain AAA type of
arrangement.</p>



<p>In this
arrangement, each sphere is in contact with four of its neighbours. Thus, the
two-dimensional coordination number is 4. Also, if the centres of these 4
immediate neighbouring spheres are joined, a square is formed. Hence this
packing is called square close packing in two dimensions.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>b) Hexagonal Close Packing:</strong></h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="133" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-03.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8058"/></figure></div>



<p>In this
arrangement, the second row may be placed above the first one in a staggered
manner such that its spheres fit in the depressions of the first row.</p>



<p>If the
arrangement of spheres in the first row is called ‘A’ type, the one in the
second row is different and may be called ‘B’ type. When the third row is
placed adjacent to the second in a staggered manner, its spheres are aligned
with those of the first row. Hence this row is also of ‘A’ type. The spheres of
the&nbsp;similarly placed fourth row will be aligned with those of the second
row (‘B’ type). Hence this arrangement is of ABAB type.</p>



<p>In this
arrangement, there is less free space and this packing is more efficient than
the square close packing. Each sphere is in contact with six of its neighbours
and the two-dimensional coordination number is 6. The centres of these six
spheres are at the corners of a regular hexagon hence this packing is called
two-dimensional hexagonal close packing.</p>



<p>It can be seen in the figure that in these rows there are some voids (empty spaces). These are triangular in shape. The triangular voids are of two different types. In one row, the apexes of the triangles are pointing upwards and in the next layer downwards.</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Close Packing in Three Dimensions:</strong></p>



<p>A three-dimensional close-packed structure can be generated by stacking (placing) layers of close-packed spheres in two dimensions one over the other. This can be done in the following ways.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Three-dimensional close packing from a&nbsp;two-dimensional
square layer:</strong></h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-04.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8059" width="140" height="144"/></figure></div>



<p>In such an arrangement, the second layer is placed over the first layer such that the spheres of the upper layer are exactly above those of the first layer. In this arrangement spheres of both the layers are perfectly aligned horizontally as well as vertically as shown. Similarly, we may place more layers one above the other.</p>



<p>If the arrangement
of spheres in the first layer is called ‘A’ type, all the layers have the same
arrangement. Thus this lattice has AAA&#8230;. type pattern. The lattice thus
generated is the simple cubic lattice, and its unit cell is the primitive cubic
unit cell.</p>



<p>The
coordination number for such arrangement is 6. The volume occupied by particles
is 52% i.e. there is 48% void space. Of all metals in the periodic table, only
polonium crystalizes in this crystal form.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Three-dimensional close packing from two-dimensional
hexagonal close-packed layers:</strong></h4>



<p>This
close-packed structure can be generated by placing layers one over the other.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="225" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-05.png" alt="https://hemantmore.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Packing-in-solids-06-300x225.png" class="wp-image-8060" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-05.png 300w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-05-285x214.png 285w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></figure></div>



<p>All the voids are equivalent in the first layer they have marked alternately as &#8216;a&#8217; and &#8216;b&#8217;. The spheres of the second layer can be either placed on voids which are marked &#8216;a&#8217; or &#8216;b&#8217; but it is impossible to place spheres on both types of voids simultaneously. When spheres of a new layer are placed on voids marked &#8216;a&#8217; then voids marked as &#8216;b; remain unoccupied.</p>



<p>Let us take
a two-dimensional hexagonal close-packed layer ‘A’ and place a similar layer
above it such that the spheres of the second layer are placed in the depressions
of the first layer. Since the spheres of the two layers are aligned
differently, let us call the second layer as B.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="377" height="244" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-06.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8061" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-06.png 377w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-06-300x194.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 377px) 100vw, 377px" /></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="503" height="243" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-07.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8062" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-07.png 503w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-07-300x145.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 503px) 100vw, 503px" /></figure></div>



<p class="has-text-align-center">T = Tetrahedral void and O = Octahedral void</p>



<p>Placing the&nbsp;third layer over the second layer can be done in two ways.  </p>



<p>It can be
observed from the figure that not all the triangular voids of the first layer
are covered by the spheres of the second layer.</p>



<p>This gives
rise to two different types of holes or voids. Wherever a sphere of the second
layer is above the void of the first layer (or vice versa) a tetrahedral void
is formed. These voids are called tetrahedral voids because a tetrahedron is
formed when the centres of these four spheres are joined.&nbsp;At other places,
the triangular voids in the second layer are above the triangular voids in the
first layer, and the triangular shapes of these do not overlap. One of them has
the apex of the triangle pointing upwards and the other downwards. These voids
have been marked as ‘O’ in the figure above.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Covering
Tetrahedral Voids (Hexagonal Closed Packing):</strong></h4>



<p>Tetrahedral voids of the second layer may be covered by the spheres of the third layer. In this case, the spheres of the third layer are exactly aligned with&nbsp;those of the first layer. Thus, the pattern of spheres is repeated in alternate layers. This pattern is often written as ABAB &#8230;&#8230;. pattern. This structure is called a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure.</p>



<p>This sort of
arrangement of atoms is found in many metals like magnesium and zinc.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="255" height="343" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-08.png" alt="" class="wp-image-8063" srcset="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-08.png 255w, https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-08-223x300.png 223w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 255px) 100vw, 255px" /></figure></div>



<p><strong>B) Covering Octahedral Voids (Cubic Closed Packing):</strong></p>



<p>The third
layer may be placed above the second layer in a manner such that its spheres
cover the octahedral voids. When placed in this manner, the spheres of the
third layer are not aligned with those of either the first or the second layer.
This arrangement is called ‘C’ type.</p>



<p>Only when the fourth layer is placed, its spheres are aligned with those of the first layer as shown. This pattern of layers is often written as ABCABC &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. This structure is called cubic close-packed (ccp) or face-centred cubic (fcc) structure.&nbsp;Metals such as copper and silver crystallise in this structure.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="266" height="300" src="https://thefactfactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Close-Packing-09.png" alt="Close packing" class="wp-image-8064"/></figure></div>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Note:</strong></p>



<p>Both these
types of close packing are highly efficient and 74% space in the crystal is
filled. In either of them, each sphere is in contact with twelve spheres. Thus,
the coordination number is 12 in either of these two structures.</p>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Characteristics of Hexagonal Close Packing:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>In this three dimensional arrangement of the unit cell, spheres of the third layer are placed on triangular-shaped tetrahedral voids of the second layer.</li><li>The spheres of the third layer lie exactly above the spheres of the first layer.</li><li>The arrangements of the first layer and third layer are identical.</li><li>The arrangement of hexagonal close packing is represented as ABAB type.</li><li>Packing efficiency is 74%</li></ul>



<p class="has-vivid-red-color has-text-color has-medium-font-size"><strong>Characteristics of Cubic Close Packing:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>In this three dimensional
arrangement of the unit cell, spheres of the third layer are placed in the
positions of tetrahedral voids having apices upward.</li><li>In this arrangement, the spheres of
the third layer do not lie exactly above the spheres of the first layer.
Actually, the spheres of the fourth layer lie exactly above the spheres of the
first layer.</li><li>The arrangements of the first layer
and third layer are different.&nbsp;The arrangements of the first layer and
fourth layer are identical.</li><li>The arrangement of cubic close
packing is represented as ABCABC type.</li><li>Packing efficiency is 74%</li></ul>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Science > <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/" target="_blank">Chemistry</a> > <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/chemistry/solid-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Solid State</a> > Packing in solids</strong></h5>
<p>The post <a href="https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/close-packing-in-solids/8050/">Packing in solids</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thefactfactor.com">The Fact Factor</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/chemistry/physical-chemistry/close-packing-in-solids/8050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
