Law > Civil Laws > Transfer of Property Act > Sale of Immovable Property Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 defines the sale of immovable property. Section 54 in The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 “Sale” defined.—‘‘Sale” is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised or part-paid and […]
Categories
Sale of Immovable Property (S. 54)
- Post author By Hemant More
- Post date July 29, 2019
- 1 Comment on Sale of Immovable Property (S. 54)
- Tags A Bhagyamma v. Bangalore Development Authority, Abdul Alim v. Abdul Sattar, Arjuna Reddy v. Arjuna C Thanga, Ashok Chandra v. Chota Nagpur Banking Corpn., Bangalore, Berni Madho v. Joh, Bishnudeo Narain Rai v. Anmol Devi, Biswanath Sahu v. Tribeni Mohan, Chander Singh v. Jamuna Prasad, Chandra Shankar v. Abhia, Commissioner of Income Tax v. Motor and General Stores, Compentency, Ghulam Mohamad v. Tek Chand, Hakim Singh v. Ram Sanehi, Hara Bewa v. Banchandilal, Immovable property, Inder Kaur v. Tara Singh, K. Lakshaman Rao v. G. Ratna Manikyamba, Kaliperunal v. Rajagopal, Kameshwar Choudhary v. State of Bihar, Krishan Tanjabi v. Aba, Lakhwinder Singh v. Paramjit Kaur, Lakshmi Narain Bamwal v. Jagdish Singh, Madan Pillai v. Badrakali, Mahima v. Dinabondhi, Malik Mohamad Shujaagt v. Salim Jahan, Mathura Mohan v. Ram Kumar, Misahul Enterprises v. Vijaya Srivastava, Munnalal v. Armaram, Nalamathu Venkaiya v. B.S. Neelkanta, Ponayya Goundan v. Muttu, Prem Singh v. Distt Board of Rawalpindi, Ram Jivan Rai v. Devli Nandan Rai, Ram Jiwan Rai v. Deoki Nandan Rai, Ram Saran Lall v. Domini Kuer, Ramlal v. Phagua, Rati Ram v. Mam Chand, Sabadeo Singh v. Kubernath, Sahadeo Singh v. Kubernath, Sale, Sale how made, Sarup Chand v. Surjit Kaur, Section 54, Shakeela Bano v. Mohd Bismil Siraj, Shib Lal v. Bhagwan, Shiva Narain Sab v. Baidya Nath Tewari, Subject matter of sale, Sura Reddy v. Ram Sarasa, Tapan Krishna Das v. Hazi Ali Khan, TOPA, Transfer of Property Act, Unnao Commercial Bank v. Kailash Nath, Venkataramana v. Rangiab
