Indian Legal System > Civil Laws > Company Law > Rule of Majority In this article, we are going to study the Foss v Harbottle case, which introduced the concept of the rule of the majority. A company is a juristic person which is conferred a separate legal entity different from the members who form […]
Categories
Foss v. Harbottle: Rule of Majority
- Post author By Hemant More
- Post date December 2, 2019
- 11 Comments on Foss v. Harbottle: Rule of Majority
- Tags (1843) 67 ER 189, (1874) 9 C App. 350, (1890) 45 Ch. D. 330 338, (1949) 1 MLJ 662, (1967) 65 DLR 501, [1904] 1 Ch. 558, [1919] 1 Ch 290, [1950] 2 All ER 1064, [1966] 1 Comp LJ 65, [1978] Ch. 406 409, [1985] 1 WLR 370, 1951 Ch. 286, 1956 AIR SC 213, AIR 1935 Lah 742, AIR 1937 Cal 645, AIR 1965 Ker 68, Bharat Insurance Company Ltd v. Kanhaiya Lal, Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co, Class action, Cook v Deeks [1916] A.C. 55, Daniels v Daniels, Dhakeswari Cotton mills v Nil Kumal Chakravorty, Edwards v. Halliwell, Fraud on minority, Glass v. Atkin, Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Limited, Henderson v Bank of Australasia, ICICI v. Parasrampuria Synthetic Ltd, Individual membership rights, Joseph v. Joss., Kanika Mukherjee v. Rameshwar Dayal Dubey, Menier v. Hooper’s Telegraph Works Ltd., Mismanagement, Nagappa Chettiar v. Madras Race Club, Nurcombe v. Nurcombe, Opression, Rajahmundry Electric Supply Corpn. v. A. Nageshwara Rao, Rule of majority, Special majority, Towers v. African Tug Co., Ultravires, Wrongdoers in control